Author |
Topic: Tyres (Read 715 times) |
|
PJDavis
Senior Member
2 x 1995 Jag X300 3.2 / 4.0 (Henley) 1957 XK140
Posts: 1474
|
I'm sure this has been covered before perhaps, but all I ask is a little direction. Ford directs me towards 225/50 16 tyes, but a lot of the suppliers say 205/55 16. I'm not a race driver, but I like sure-footedness. I'm looking at Conti' contact premiums in either size, I like the Hankook tyres as well, the K104 and K105, in either size as well. It's only a 2.3 I have, with the normal 6.5 Ultima wheels. Suggestions are welcome. Peter.
|
|
IP Logged |
I love 'Movvy' 1995 Jaguar XJ6 X300 3.2 (Henley) 1995 Jaguar XJ6 X330 4.0 (Dopey) 1957 Jaguar XK140 USA (converted to RHD, and to have fitted Mk10 420G Engine with BW 65 Auto Trans)
|
|
|
tlundkvi
Full Member
Ex. Scorpio 2.9 24V -95
Posts: 909
|
|
Re: Tyres
« Reply #1 on: Apr 17th, 2009, 7:44am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Apr 16th, 2009, 8:57pm, PJDavis wrote:I'm sure this has been covered before perhaps, but all I ask is a little direction. Ford directs me towards 225/50 16 tyes, but a lot of the suppliers say 205/55 16. I'm not a race driver, but I like sure-footedness. I'm looking at Conti' contact premiums in either size, I like the Hankook tyres as well, the K104 and K105, in either size as well. It's only a 2.3 I have, with the normal 6.5 Ultima wheels. Suggestions are welcome. Peter. |
| 225/50 R16 is an "odd", expensive size. The 205/55R16 has Load index 91, which should be enough. You will not get a speedo error at all, 205/55 is a perfect alternative in that sense. It might even become more comfortable to drive, as it forgives worn road surfaces better. If all four were to be changed, I'd go for 205/55R16 purely for economical reasons. At least from the tire suppliers I know of, prices are about the same for a set of premium (big 6) 205/55R16 as for a set of "runner up" quality of 225/50R16. I live in Finland so of course prices are different from UK, but probably not relatively in comparison: Example Continental Premium Contact 2, 205/55R16, 85 euros/pc and 225/50R16 for 128 euros/pc Hankook k105 ventus prime, 225/50R16, 82 euros/pc
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Jonnycab
Senior Member
Former owner of 2.3 Ultima Facelift saloon
Posts: 3900
|
|
Re: Tyres
« Reply #2 on: Apr 18th, 2009, 2:12am » |
Quote Modify
|
The tyres that are factory fitted to the 12 spokes are 225/50/16. But it's all a matter of personal choice whether you want to change the tyre size. Personally I'd stick with the 225/50/16s, they make the car look alot meatier I find this site good for comparing the sizes of tyres & how they will affect the speedo reading.....http://www.kouki.co.uk/utilities/visual-tyre-size-calculator
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Scorpio
Full Member
Posts: 562
|
|
Re: Tyres
« Reply #3 on: Apr 18th, 2009, 3:45pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Stick with the 225's Peter. Shop around and you will pick up some good ones for a decent price. I bought an Ultima with the 205's and the handling was compromised. Fitted 225's and the drivabilty was far superior.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
PJDavis
Senior Member
2 x 1995 Jag X300 3.2 / 4.0 (Henley) 1957 XK140
Posts: 1474
|
|
Re: Tyres
« Reply #4 on: Apr 21st, 2009, 7:06am » |
Quote Modify
|
Yep, I thought these might be the replies I would get, and thanks for that guys. I think I will stick to the 225's, I can get Hankooks k104 and K105 for about £70 each so I'm happy with that. Thery're a good enough tyre, I have them on my wifes car and the grip and mileage is fine.
|
|
IP Logged |
I love 'Movvy' 1995 Jaguar XJ6 X300 3.2 (Henley) 1995 Jaguar XJ6 X330 4.0 (Dopey) 1957 Jaguar XK140 USA (converted to RHD, and to have fitted Mk10 420G Engine with BW 65 Auto Trans)
|
|
|
tlundkvi
Full Member
Ex. Scorpio 2.9 24V -95
Posts: 909
|
|
Re: Tyres
« Reply #5 on: Apr 21st, 2009, 8:08am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Apr 21st, 2009, 7:06am, PJDavis wrote:Yep, I thought these might be the replies I would get, and thanks for that guys. I think I will stick to the 225's, I can get Hankooks k104 and K105 for about £70 each so I'm happy with that. Thery're a good enough tyre, I have them on my wifes car and the grip and mileage is fine. |
| For the price difference they are a bargain. In one of the car magazines I read, it was praised, except for some minor control issues during aquaplaning. Overall, it (K105 Ventus prime) got 8.3 while the top 3 (Continental won) got around 8.9/10. There were some Linglongs that got 5.5 too We need to remember that at the when the Scorp was new, the best tires could probably not beat the Hankooks now. I need only two, and in this case I would not mix profiles, so I would probably go for the Hankooks 225/50 as well.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|